The clean pull is the most measurable expression of triple extension — ankles, knees, hips firing in sequence to drive a barbell vertically. Suchomel et al. (2017) showed that pull derivatives produce power outputs equivalent to the full clean while removing the catch-related injury exposure that derails so many novice lifters. Yet many coaches still try to teach the full clean directly and lose the first six weeks of any program to learning bottlenecks. This guide presents a seven-stage roadmap — (1) hang pull (mid-hang), (2) hang pull (above knee), (3) pull from the floor, (4) cluster pull, (5) hang high pull, (6) high pull from the floor, (7) full clean pull — with objective 800Hz IMU pass criteria for advancement: peak concentric velocity, triple-extension timing, and bilateral impulse balance. Coaches stop guessing whether a stage is “ready” and start moving on data. The result is a faster, safer, and more transparent learning curve, especially for athletes whose careers cannot afford eight wasted weeks at the start of every off-season.
The 7-Stage Roadmap
Pull progression is not just about adding load — it is about gradually expanding the acceleration distance. The shortest distance (mid-hang) lets the athlete focus on bar speed and triple-extension timing without the complexity of a full pull from the floor. As the start position drops, the cognitive and physical demands rise. The table below summarizes recommended loads and pass criteria.
| Stage | Movement | Load (% Clean 1RM) | Peak Velocity Pass |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hang Pull (mid-hang) | 50–60 | ≥ 1.6 m/s |
| 2 | Hang Pull (above knee) | 55–65 | ≥ 1.7 m/s |
| 3 | Pull from Floor | 60–70 | ≥ 1.6 m/s |
| 4 | Cluster Pull | 65–75 | ≥ 1.7 m/s |
| 5 | Hang High Pull | 70–80 | ≥ 1.8 m/s |
| 6 | High Pull from Floor | 75–85 | ≥ 1.7 m/s |
| 7 | Full Clean Pull | 80–95 | ≥ 1.6 m/s |
Pass criteria are met when the athlete clears the velocity target on four of five reps for three consecutive sessions. For the catch portion of the lift, see our power clean technique guide.
Stage-Specific Coaching Cues
The coaching cues change by stage. In stages 1–2 (hang pulls), prioritize postural integrity with “chest tall, shoulders over the bar.” In stage 3 (pull from floor), introduce double tension with “slow off the floor, explosive at the knee.” In stages 4–5 (high pulls), teach trap engagement and pulling timing with “elbows high, late.” In stages 6–7, reinforce the triple-extension sequence with “press the floor, then jump.” The single cue that applies across every stage: “the bar does not lift you, you lift the bar.” For the hang variant’s power-development context, see our hang clean power development guide.
Data-Based Stage Advancement
To turn “looks good” into a defensible decision, watch three metrics. First, peak concentric velocity (PCV) must clear the stage’s threshold in the table above. Second, triple-extension timing — the elapsed time between ankle, knee, and hip extension peaks — should fall below 50 ms. Third, the bilateral vertical impulse ratio should sit between 0.95 and 1.05.
| Metric | Tool | Pass Criterion | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak Concentric Velocity | 800Hz IMU | Stage table | Acceleration capacity |
| Triple-Extension Timing | IMU + video | < 50 ms | Sequence consistency |
| Bilateral Impulse Ratio | Dual force plates | 0.95–1.05 | Symmetry |
These metrics become more powerful when paired with reactive strength index data over time.
<p>In a 12-week deployment with a Korean high-school weightlifting program, the cohort using PoinT GO data to gate stage advancement gained an average of 8.4 kg on the full clean, while the time-based control group (“move on after four weeks”) gained only 3.1 kg. Stage criteria, when measured, accelerate development.</p> Learn More About PoinT GO
Common Errors and Corrections
The three most common errors are: (1) early arm pull — peak velocity stalls below 1.4 m/s; correct with “hips first, arms later.” (2) bar path looping around the knees — review the side-view video and cue heel pressure. (3) bilateral impulse asymmetry — if the ratio falls below 0.95, do not advance; insert single-leg accessory work (split squat, single-leg RDL) until the ratio normalizes. Every correction should be data-driven; coach intuition is best used to generate hypotheses, not to confirm them.
Frequently asked questions
01How long does each stage typically take?+
02Can I skip pull progressions and teach the full clean directly?+
03Does this work for youth athletes?+
04What if the athlete cannot meet a stage threshold?+
05Can this be done without an IMU?+
Related Articles
Power Clean Technique: Step-by-Step Guide for Athletes
Master the power clean with this complete technique guide. Learn the pull, catch position, common errors, coaching cues, and programming for athletic power...
Hang Clean for Power: Technique, Benefits & Programming
Master the hang clean for explosive power development. Covers proper technique, common errors, programming progressions, and VBT application for strength...
Reactive Strength Index (RSI) Explained: Testing, Calculation & Training
Learn what the reactive strength index (RSI) measures, how to calculate it from depth jumps, normative values by sport, and how to train reactive strength.
Athletic Testing Battery: Essential Performance Tests for Athletes
Build a comprehensive athletic testing battery. Covers jump tests, strength assessment, speed testing, and flexibility — with norms, protocols, and...
How to Build a Force-Velocity Profile: 6-Step VBT Protocol
Step-by-step guide to building an individual force-velocity profile using VBT. Test load selection, data collection, profile interpretation, and program
How to Calibrate a Velocity Sensor: 5-Step VBT Accuracy Protocol
Step-by-step calibration protocol for VBT velocity sensors. Reference measurement, mounting positions, baseline establishment, and accuracy verification.
How to Improve Power Clean Technique with IMU Data
Diagnose and fix the 5 most common power clean technique faults using 800Hz IMU velocity data.
Why Snatch Form Matters More Than Weight: An IMU Perspective
The snatch is the most technique-dependent lift. See how 800Hz IMU data redefines the form-vs-weight debate, plus a proven 8-week technique-first protocol.
Measure performance with lab-grade accuracy