PoinT GOResearch
researchresearchtesting

Vertical Jump Height Norms by Age, Sex & Sport

Comprehensive vertical jump height normative data by age group, sex, and sport. Includes CMJ and SJ norms, sport-specific benchmarks, and how to compare your jump to published standards.

PG
PoinT GO Research Team
||9 min read
Vertical Jump Height Norms by Age, Sex & Sport

Vertical jump height normative data allows athletes, coaches, and trainers to contextualize jump performance — determining whether a score is below average, average, or elite for a given age group, sex, or sport. This article compiles the most widely cited and methodologically sound normative datasets for countermovement jump (CMJ) and standing vertical jump, organized by age, sex, and sport.

All normative data below reflects countermovement jump with arm swing (the most common test variant) unless otherwise noted. Equipment used in the referenced studies includes force plates, timing mats, and validated IMU sensors.

General Population Norms

Male Adults (18–35 years)

CategoryJump Height (cm)Percentile
Excellent>65 cm90th+
Good55–65 cm70th–90th
Above Average45–55 cm50th–70th
Average35–45 cm30th–50th
Below Average<35 cm<30th

Female Adults (18–35 years)

CategoryJump Height (cm)Percentile
Excellent>50 cm90th+
Good40–50 cm70th–90th
Above Average32–40 cm50th–70th
Average25–32 cm30th–50th
Below Average<25 cm<30th

Sport-Specific Normative Data

Basketball

  • NBA players: Average CMJ ~72–82 cm (no approach jump)
  • NCAA Division I male: 58–72 cm
  • NCAA Division I female: 44–56 cm
  • Recreational basketball players: 42–58 cm (male), 30–44 cm (female)

Volleyball

  • Elite female volleyball players: 48–62 cm
  • College female volleyball: 42–55 cm
  • Elite male volleyball (professional): 68–82 cm

Soccer

  • Male professional: 52–68 cm
  • Female professional: 38–52 cm
  • Youth soccer (U17 male): 42–56 cm

American Football (NFL Combine)

  • All positions average (running jump): 85–102 cm
  • Skill positions (WR, CB, S): 90–108 cm
  • Linemen: 75–92 cm

Track & Field

  • Elite sprinters (100–200m, male): 65–80 cm CMJ
  • Elite jumpers (long jump, triple jump): 70–90 cm CMJ
  • Middle distance runners: 45–60 cm

Rugby

  • Professional male backs: 55–70 cm
  • Professional male forwards: 48–62 cm

Test Your Jump Height Against the Norms with PoinT GO

PoinT GO measures your CMJ height with 98%+ accuracy — so when you compare your score to the normative data above, you know the number is real. Track your progress toward sport-specific benchmarks with lab-grade precision.

Learn More

How to Compare Your Jump to Norms

Ensure Protocol Consistency

Normative data is only valid if measured with the same protocol. The most important factors: (1) CMJ with or without arm swing — most published norms use free arm swing; (2) surface and footwear — springy surfaces inflate scores; (3) measurement device — different devices have different systematic biases. When in doubt, use arm swing and a validated device.

Use the Right Reference Group

Compare yourself to the most specific applicable norm: same sex, same age group, same sport, same competition level. Comparing a 45-year-old recreational athlete to NBA norms is meaningless. Use the general population table as a baseline and sport-specific data when available.

Interpret Trends Over Absolute Values

Your own trend is more informative than any normative comparison. An athlete who has improved from 38 cm to 48 cm in 12 weeks is experiencing excellent development, regardless of where they stand percentile-wise. Use norms for context, not as the primary metric of success.

Limitations of Normative Data

Methodological Heterogeneity

Different studies use different devices (force plates, timing mats, Vertec, IMU sensors), different protocols (arm swing vs. restricted, different warm-up), and different populations (recreational, collegiate, elite, national). This creates real variation in normative values across published sources — a "good" score in one reference may be "average" in another.

Population Drift Over Time

Athletic populations become more explosive over decades as training methods improve and selection for athletic traits intensifies at elite levels. Norms published in the 1990s for elite athletes are significantly lower than current standards in the same sports. Use recent literature (post-2010 preferred) for current elite comparisons.

Position and Role Specificity

Sport-level norms often aggregate across positions. A basketball point guard and a center have very different jump height profiles — the guard may average 72 cm while the center averages 62 cm. Position-specific data is available in the research literature for major sports and provides more meaningful comparisons. 이와 관련하여 점프 성능을 위한 VBT: 메타분석 리뷰도 함께 읽어보시면 더 많은 도움이 됩니다.

Frequently Asked Questions

QWhat is the average vertical jump for a male?

The average countermovement jump for adult males (18–35 years) in the general athletic population is approximately 35–45 cm. For college-level athletes, the average is higher at 50–60 cm depending on sport. NBA players average 72–82 cm. What counts as "average" depends heavily on context — compare to the most relevant reference group for your age, sex, and sport.

QWhat is a good vertical jump for high school athletes?

For high school males (15–18 years), 50–60 cm is considered good. For high school females in the same age range, 36–47 cm is good. Athletes in the top 10% for their sport-specific context (basketball, volleyball, track) will be above these ranges.

QDoes vertical jump height differ by sport?

Yes, significantly. Basketball and volleyball players typically show the highest vertical jump heights due to direct selection for this quality and years of jump-specific training. Endurance athletes (distance runners, cyclists) tend to score lower. Sprinters and field event athletes show high jump performance despite their events not directly requiring vertical jump.

QHow does vertical jump change with age?

Vertical jump typically peaks between ages 20–28. After 30, recreational athletes see approximately 1–2 cm decline per decade without targeted training. Masters athletes who maintain plyometric and strength training can slow this decline substantially — well-trained 50-year-olds often jump near the levels of untrained 25-year-olds.

QWhat is the difference between CMJ and standing vertical jump norms?

CMJ (countermovement jump with arm swing) norms are the most commonly reported and are higher than hands-on-hips CMJ or squat jump norms by 5–15 cm. If you are comparing to published norms, match your protocol exactly. Most athletic screening and sport science research uses CMJ with free arm swing.

Related Articles

research

Velocity-Based Training for Jump Performance: Meta-Analysis Review

Review of research on velocity-based training (VBT) for improving vertical jump performance. Summary of key findings from meta-analyses and RCTs.

research

Reactive Strength Index (RSI) Explained: What It Is and Why It Matters

Understand Reactive Strength Index (RSI) — what it measures, how to test it, normative values, and how to improve it for better athletic performance.

research

Jump Height Measurement Methods: Accuracy Comparison Study

Comparing jump height measurement methods: force plate, flight time, video analysis, and IMU sensors. Accuracy, reliability, and practical recommendations.

research

Jump Height Measurement Methods: Flight Time vs Force Plate

Research-backed comparison of jump height measurement methods — force plate, IMU sensors, timing mats, and flight time equations. Accuracy, validity, and practical recommendations.

research

Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull (IMTP): Testing Protocol, Norms & Applications

Complete guide to the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test. Covers standardized protocol, force-time variables, normative data, reliability, and applications in athlete monitoring.

research

Altitude Training and Sea-Level Performance Evidence

Altitude Training and Sea-Level Performance Evidence. Research-backed protocols and PoinT GO data utilization guide.

research

Isometric Strength and Injury Risk Factors Research

Isometric Strength and Injury Risk Factors Research. Research-backed protocols and PoinT GO data utilization guide.

research

Neuromuscular Fatigue Monitoring Methods Comparison

Neuromuscular Fatigue Monitoring Methods Comparison. Research-backed protocols and PoinT GO data utilization guide.

Measure performance with lab-grade accuracy

Get PoinT GO